Read source article here
Eugene Linden
Los Angeles Times
August 28, 2011
Global warming is extracting real costs, even in states where the governors are in denial.
Leon Trotsky is reputed to have quipped, “You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you.” Substitute the words “climate change” for “war” and the quote is perfectly suited for the governors of Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico, all of whom have ridiculed or dismissed the threat of climate change even as their states suffer record-breaking heat and drought.
In his book, “Fed Up!,” Texas governor and presidential aspirant Rick Perry derided global warming as a “phony mess,” a sentiment he has expanded on in recent campaign appearances. Susana Martinez, the governor of New Mexico, has gone on record as doubting that humans influence climate, and Mary Fallin of Oklahoma dismissed research on climate change as a waste of time. Her solution to the extraordinary drought: Pray for rain (an approach also endorsed by Perry).
Although they may dismiss climate change, a changing climate imposes costs on their states and the rest of us as well.
In Texas, the unremitting heat has been straining the capacity of the electric grid, killing crops and livestock, and threatening water supplies. As reported in the Wall Street Journal, the grid’s governing body, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, bases its forecasts on the average demand over the previous 10 years. In a world without the threat of global warming, this is an entirely reasonable approach. But what if climate change makes the past an unreliable guide to the future? Then Texas is left with the present situation, in which the grid operator is forced to procure power in a tight market where wholesale prices have skyrocketed to 60 times normal.
Read the full article at the Los Angeles Times
Read source article here
Purva Patel
Chron.com
Paying 7.8 cents per kilowatt-hour seemed like a good deal to John Wheat when he signed up for a month-to-month electricity plan in June.
But in July, when record-breaking heat led to record-breaking power use statewide, Wheat’s rate soared to nearly 19 cents per kilowatt-hour.

“I thought since I’m in the business and watch pricing every day, I could cancel at any time with a month-to-month,” said Wheat, a Sugar Land resident who sells TXU Energy electric plans to businesses. “Unfortunately, I didn’t take into account what they would charge based on demand.”
Rates in a variable plan can fluctuate monthly based on the company’s costs and other factors.
In recent weeks wholesale power prices – what power retailers pay for the electricity they sell to customers – spiked to as much as $3 per kilowatt-hour during some particularly hot days.
Wheat’s bill last month, $586.65, was the highest he’s ever paid to power his 1,450- square-foot house.
Read the full article at Chron.com
Read source article here
Press Release
August 26, 2011
NEW YORK, Aug 26, 2011 (BUSINESS WIRE) — Fitch Ratings has upgraded Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC’s (Oncor) Long-term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to ‘BBB’ from ‘BBB-’. The long term security ratings have also been upgraded by one-notch. The short-term IDR is affirmed at F3′. The Rating Outlook is Stable. A full list of ratings actions is provided below.
The upgrade reflects consistent strong performance by the utility over the last two years driven by a rebound in sales volume growth and balanced outcome of recent rate cases that have led to a steady improvement in key credit metrics. Fitch expects profitability and credit metrics to continue to appreciate over the forecast period led by significant transmission build out that is well supported by constructive regulation. Management’s refinancing initiatives in the fall of 2010 extended a portion of 2012-13 debt maturities, thus, lowering re-financing risk emanating from the concerns surrounding the financial health of its ultimate parent, Energy Future Holdings Corp. (IDR CCC).
Read the full press release at Marketwatch.com.
Read source article here
Matt Joyce
Dallas Business Journal
As one of the smaller players in the retail electricity market, Arlington-based Texas Power’s biggest challenge is convincing the public to consider switching power providers, said David Chase, the company’s general manager.
“The biggest obstacle for any new entrant is market education,” Chase said.
Across Texas, about 57 percent of residential customers in the competitive market have switched providers since deregulation took effect in 2002, according to the Electric Reliability Council of Texas.
The other 43 percent remain with incumbent carriers, such as TXU Energy and Reliant.
Continue reading at the Dallas Business Journal.
Read source article here
Jack Z. Smith
Fort Worth Star-Telegram
Hundreds of thousands of electric customers have received double billings or experienced other hiccups in their normal monthly billing patterns as a result of a major computer software problem experienced by Dallas-based Oncor Electric Delivery.
Oncor spokeswoman Megan Wright said today that the problem occurred in the period from July 19-29, resulting in Oncor significantly delaying the transfer of electricity consumption data from meter readings to retail electric providers, or REPs, that have customers in Oncor’s sprawling service territory.
“As soon as we realized there was a problem, we started communicating with retailers during those 10 days…we have fixed the problem now, so there won’t be any more problems,” Wright said.
TXU Energy, the largest REP in North Texas, had “many” affected customers, numbering in the thousands, TXU spokesman Michael Patterson said today.
Read the full article at the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.
Read source article here
Kimberly King
NBCDFW.com
Some North Texans are facing devastating sticker shock this summer as variable-rate electric plans skyrocket.
Some homeowners say the variable rates are like filling up your car only to find out that the price per gallon has jumped — and you have no choice but to pay.
Electric companies have every legal right to adjust the rates, but it also seems they’ll negotiate if you speak out. One customer’s rate was retroactively adjusted by more than $400 after NBC 5 investigated his bill.
Electric bills can look like a maze of line items with all sorts of bar graphs and fees. And many of those with variable-rate plans don’t look closely at the amount per kilowatt hour until it stings.
“It was shocking,” homeowner Ryan Walton said of his variable-rate bill from Dynowatt to cool his family of five in Arlington.
Read the full article at NBCDFW.com.
Read source article here
Tom Fowler
MySanAntonio.com
August 24, 2011
A prolonged drought, looming environmental rules and shortcomings in the incentives for building new power plants could cause even more problems with Texas’ electric grid in the next year.
A number of Texas power plants may need to cut back operations or shut down completely if the state’s severe drought continues into the fall, as water levels in many plant cooling reservoirs continue to drop, said Kent Saathoff, vice president of system planning and operations for the Electric Reliability Council of Texas.
At least one plant already has had to cut back on its output during the record-breaking year for temperatures and power demand in Texas.
“The bottom line is there’s not much we can do absent rain,” Saathoff said in an interview. “Cooling reservoirs just aren’t being replenished.”
Read the full article at MySanAntonio.com.
Read source article here
Press Release
August 23, 2011
PRESS RELEASE – On August 19, 2011, the Public Utility Commission of Texas approved at an open meeting the settlement terms contained in the Modified Stipulation filed by Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC with respect to the settlement of Oncor’s previously filed rate review.
The rate review was filed in January 2011 with the PUCT (PUCT Docket No. 38929) and 203 cities based on a test year ended June 30, 2010. The PUCT, with Oncor’s input and that of cities and other participating parties, established a procedural schedule for the review. On April 8, 2011, Oncor filed, and the administrative law judges in the rate review granted, a motion requesting abatement of the procedural schedule in the rate review on the grounds that Oncor and the parties to the rate review had reached a Memorandum of Settlement that would settle and resolve all issues in the rate review. On May 11, 2011, Oncor filed a stipulation which incorporated the Memorandum of Settlement (the “Stipulation”) along with proposed tariffs and other documentation for the purpose of obtaining final approval of the settlement. The terms of the Stipulation include an approximate $137 million base rate increase and additional provisions to address franchise fees (discussed further below) and other expenses. Approximately $93 million of the increase became effective July 1, 2011 (on an interim basis), and the remainder will become effective by January 1, 2012. The Stipulation did not change Oncor’s authorized regulatory capital structure of 60% debt and 40% equity or its authorized return on equity of 10.25%. Under the terms of the Stipulation, Oncor cannot file another general base rate review prior to July 1, 2013, but is not restricted from filing wholesale transmission rate, transmission cost recovery factor, distribution-related investment or other rate updates and adjustments permitted by Texas state law and PUCT rules.
Read the full press release “SEC Filing: Public Utility Commission of Texas Approves $137M Base Rate Increase for Oncor Electric“
Read source article here
Waco Tribune-Herald
If you think it’s hot, just imagine what it’s like for those who can’t cover the high cost of utility bills and must suffer this unrelenting heat. With the temperature seemingly stuck at well over 100 and August only beginning, Texans are right to wonder about that extra buck or so that many of us pay atop our utility bills, supposedly to assist destitute seniors and the poor in paying their energy bills.
Answer: State legislators last spring reallocated it in what The Dallas Morning News aptly describes as a “tax-and-switch.”
Some might be happy lawmakers didn’t have to raise taxes for the next two years. But one way they managed this was by raiding funds that trusting constituents believe are dedicated for specific purposes. And that buck fee added to your utility bill each month is supposed to help folks with low or fixed incomes get at least some relief on sky-high utility bills. That would seem to be essential during the worst heat wave our state has seen in years. We might even call it a matter of life and death.
Read the full article at http://www.oaoa.com/opinion/bills-70528-utility-atop.html
Read source article here
Kevin Cokely
Nbcdfw.com
Back to school could bring big power problems across Texas.
School air conditioners are already whining, and when classes start Monday, the state’s 8,317 public schools could strain the power grid.
“The main concern is as long as we’re still having these high temperatures, we’re going to have high electricity demand on the grid,” said ERCOT spokesperson Dottie Roark. “And whenever we have that high demand it means we’re tight on our capacity.”
Altogether, Texas schools add about 1500 megawatts of demand to the state’s power grid – enough to have caused rolling blackouts in both July and early August.
Continue reading at Nbcdfw.com.